Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE kills on a map
21.1189
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.64.2
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
34951010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Ancient
43%
Dust II
33%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
22%
Anubis
4%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Ancient
43%
14
1
Dust II
33%
9
6
Nuke
0%
1
6
Mirage
55%
11
2
Anubis
64%
14
0
Inferno
53%
15
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Nuke
33%
6
0
Mirage
33%
3
2
Anubis
60%
5
0
Inferno
50%
6
0
Info
Match analysis of SENSEI vs VELOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SENSEI and VELOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by SENSEI. The MVP of this match was toto.
SENSEI analytics
The team SENSEI secured 29 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SENSEI were perez contributed 39 kills and lub contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18733 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SENSEI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
VELOX analytics
The team VELOX managed to secure 22 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for VELOX were toto contributed 38 kills and maaxg contributed 40 kills. 18433 of total damage by VELOX could not prevent SENSEI from securing the victory
On the defensive side, VELOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments