SENSEI Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

9

3

+13

125

3:1

8

0

9.1

+75%

14

8

7

+6

97

3:1

2

0

7.5

+44%

11

5

5

+6

93

1:1

2

1

7.0

+35%

11

11

4

0

90

1:1

3

1

6.7

+15%

12

7

1

+5

71

1:2

3

0

6.3

0%

Total

70

40

20

+30

476

9:6

18

2

7.3

+42%

Hawks Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

14

9

-4

94

1:2

2

1

6.7

-5%

10

13

2

-3

62

2:2

3

0

6.0

-10%

7

14

2

-7

55

1:2

0

0

4.9

-8%

7

14

2

-7

45

1:2

1

0

4.7

-39%

6

15

1

-9

49

1:1

0

0

4.5

-31%

Total

40

70

16

-30

305

6:9

6

1

5.4

-19%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SENSEI vs Hawks by the Bo3.gg Team

SENSEI on Inferno Analysis

SENSEI demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SENSEI on Inferno were perez, who contributed 22 kills, and CutzMeretz, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7142 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SENSEI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Hawks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Hawks, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Hawks on Inferno included guidimon, who contributed 10 kills, and nacho, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4570 total damage, Hawks couldn't prevent SENSEI from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Hawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date