0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
83%
Dust II
80%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
33%
Inferno
28%
Overpass
20%
Nuke
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Vertigo
33%
6
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
78%
9
0
Overpass
20%
5
0
Nuke
56%
9
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
83%
12
0
Dust II
80%
5
4
Vertigo
0%
1
8
Ancient
33%
3
3
Inferno
50%
16
1
Overpass
0%
2
8
Nuke
53%
15
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lwwll
Info
Map Analysis of SD Invicta vs NASR by the Bo3.gg Team
NASR on Inferno Analysis
NASR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for NASR on Inferno were Bibu, who contributed 25 kills, and almazer, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11526 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, NASR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SD Invicta on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SD Invicta, as they managed to secure 29 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SD Invicta on Inferno included maty, who contributed 24 kills, and tAk, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10569 total damage, SD Invicta couldn't prevent NASR from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, SD Invicta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments