0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
4.9
7.4
Nuke2.5
Win Rounds
4
16
Nuke12
Kills
48
94
Nuke46
Damage
5.74K
9.82K
Nuke4081
Economy
326.35K
476.55K
Nuke150200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
88%
Vertigo
40%
Nuke
G
29%
Overpass
20%
Dust II
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
88%
8
0
Vertigo
40%
5
0
Nuke
71%
7
0
Overpass
20%
5
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwllw
- w
Info
Match analysis of SD Invicta vs GearGaming by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SD Invicta and GearGaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by GearGaming. The MVP of this match was lesswill.
GearGaming analytics
The team GearGaming secured 0 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GearGaming were lesswill contributed 25 kills and eightz999 contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9822 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GearGaming held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SD Invicta analytics
The team SD Invicta managed to secure 20 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SD Invicta were maty contributed 18 kills and AwwEzz contributed 9 kills. 5760 of total damage by SD Invicta could not prevent GearGaming from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SD Invicta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments