Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7330
AK47 damage (avg/round)
6525.3
Shots (total/round)
8416
Damage (total/round)
39273
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38721012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
65%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
22%
Inferno
20%
Dust II
13%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
65%
17
1
Overpass
50%
6
22
Nuke
33%
3
20
Inferno
55%
20
5
Dust II
56%
18
2
Ancient
27%
11
10
Mirage
58%
26
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
15
Overpass
0%
2
7
Nuke
55%
11
1
Inferno
75%
8
8
Dust II
43%
7
1
Ancient
33%
3
7
Mirage
60%
5
7
Info
Match analysis of SC vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SC and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Dust II, and victory was secured by SC. The MVP of this match was xseveN.
SC analytics
The team SC secured 39 out of 78 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Dust II. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SC were eku contributed 60 kills and MakiG contributed 61 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29166 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 39 out of 78 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were xseveN contributed 53 kills and zehN contributed 53 kills. 26836 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent SC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments