0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
100%
Mirage
83%
Dust II
67%
Anubis
44%
Ancient
42%
Inferno
17%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Mirage
83%
6
0
Dust II
67%
6
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Nuke
0%
4
3
Mirage
0%
2
3
Dust II
0%
1
4
Anubis
44%
9
1
Ancient
42%
19
0
Inferno
42%
12
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- wllww
Info
Map Analysis of SGGT vs Gods Reign by the Bo3.gg Team
SGGT on Nuke Analysis
SGGT demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SGGT on Nuke were Haski4, who contributed 20 kills, and lame, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8627 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, SGGT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Gods Reign on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Gods Reign, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Gods Reign on Nuke included Ph1NNN, who contributed 16 kills, and f1redup, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6317 total damage, Gods Reign couldn't prevent SGGT from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Gods Reign struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments