Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:24s01:30s
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.925.3
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
Shots (total/round)
8916
Shots (total/round)
8716
Shots (total/round)
10716
Player score (round)
37391012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
83%
Nuke
56%
Mirage
40%
Overpass
33%
Dust II
0%
Inferno
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
83%
6
0
Nuke
100%
5
0
Mirage
0%
0
9
Overpass
100%
1
6
Dust II
0%
3
0
Inferno
50%
4
1
Ancient
0%
2
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
8
Nuke
44%
9
0
Mirage
40%
5
3
Overpass
67%
6
0
Dust II
0%
3
6
Inferno
50%
8
0
Ancient
0%
0
3
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs AGF by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and AGF, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Vertigo, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was stadodo.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 32 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were stadodo contributed 34 kills and JUST contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19939 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AGF analytics
The team AGF managed to secure 20 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AGF were Cabbi contributed 43 kills and fr0slev contributed 36 kills. 17897 of total damage by AGF could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AGF struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments