SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

22

19

3

+3

77

4:2

3

1

7.0

+6%

20

16

2

+4

84

5:1

5

0

6.9

+9%

18

21

5

-3

76

1:3

5

0

5.8

-5%

12

18

4

-6

52

4:3

3

0

5.4

-17%

8

20

10

-12

64

1:2

1

0

4.6

-32%

Total

80

94

24

-14

354

15:11

17

1

5.9

-8%

1WIN Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

16

8

+3

98

1:1

4

1

6.7

+5%

22

18

1

+4

84

5:4

7

0

6.3

+7%

20

17

3

+3

78

2:5

6

0

6.1

+1%

16

15

6

+1

89

1:3

3

1

6.0

+7%

17

14

3

+3

58

2:2

4

0

5.9

+2%

Total

94

80

21

+14

406

11:15

24

2

6.2

+4%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs 1WIN by the Bo3.gg Team

1WIN on Nuke Analysis

1WIN demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 1WIN on Nuke were deko, who contributed 19 kills, and TRAVIS, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10155 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SAW on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke included rmn, who contributed 22 kills, and adamS, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8839 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent 1WIN from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date