Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:24s01:25s
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.5022
AK47 kills on a map
136.5019
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
154.1
Shots (total/round)
8916
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
9523.7
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
34%
Nuke
33%
Vertigo
28%
Ancient
19%
Mirage
15%
Inferno
9%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
3
18
Nuke
71%
41
0
Vertigo
55%
33
4
Ancient
48%
27
21
Mirage
63%
41
6
Inferno
56%
9
31
Anubis
43%
21
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
3
8
Nuke
38%
13
9
Vertigo
83%
6
15
Ancient
67%
18
5
Mirage
48%
21
4
Inferno
65%
17
1
Anubis
40%
5
26
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sashi vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sashi and TSM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was niko.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were niko contributed 18 kills and valde contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8605 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sashi were IceBerg contributed 16 kills and MistR contributed 13 kills. 6713 of total damage by Sashi could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sashi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments