0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.125.2
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.5022
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
16.54.1
M4A1 kills on a map
84.4189
Galil kills on a map
51.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
25.95.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.65.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.55.9
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
59%
Dust II
42%
Inferno
20%
Mirage
15%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
10%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
59%
32
4
Dust II
33%
3
29
Inferno
64%
11
36
Mirage
56%
43
11
Nuke
73%
44
0
Anubis
46%
26
19
Ancient
52%
29
28
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
32
Dust II
75%
20
6
Inferno
44%
18
8
Mirage
71%
24
3
Nuke
59%
17
11
Anubis
36%
22
8
Ancient
54%
41
1
Info
Match analysis of Sashi vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sashi and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by GUN5. The MVP of this match was Easy.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GUN5 were Easy contributed 35 kills and tN1R contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16970 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GUN5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sashi were Lucky contributed 27 kills and kwezz contributed 25 kills. 12707 of total damage by Sashi could not prevent GUN5 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sashi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments