Sao Caetano Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

16

1

+8

81

4:1

5

0

7.0

+20%

14

18

5

-4

65

3:1

3

0

5.6

-14%

13

20

5

-7

62

0:4

3

0

4.9

-18%

9

19

5

-10

61

3:5

2

0

4.8

-21%

9

18

3

-9

57

0:6

2

0

4.2

-22%

Total

69

91

19

-22

326

10:17

15

0

5.3

-11%

ARCTIC Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

16

4

+5

85

7:0

6

0

7.3

+11%

18

15

5

+3

89

3:2

6

0

6.5

+11%

18

14

7

+4

83

3:4

3

0

6.4

+7%

18

16

9

+2

69

2:2

4

0

6.0

-6%

15

10

4

+5

47

2:2

4

0

5.6

-10%

Total

90

71

29

+19

374

17:10

23

0

6.4

+3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Sao Caetano vs ARCTIC by the Bo3.gg Team

ARCTIC on Inferno Analysis

ARCTIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ARCTIC on Inferno were short, who contributed 21 kills, and ninjaZ, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10099 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ARCTIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sao Caetano on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sao Caetano, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sao Caetano on Inferno included zqk, who contributed 24 kills, and delboNi, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8799 total damage, Sao Caetano couldn't prevent ARCTIC from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sao Caetano struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date