0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
103.4
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.15.4
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
39673
Player score (round)
58461012
Player's aces
1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Overpass
38%
Nuke
28%
Mirage
26%
Dust II
14%
Vertigo
14%
Inferno
6%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
4
7
Overpass
0%
0
42
Nuke
30%
20
13
Mirage
30%
23
8
Dust II
55%
20
5
Vertigo
64%
11
7
Inferno
66%
29
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
14
Overpass
38%
8
14
Nuke
58%
12
4
Mirage
56%
16
1
Dust II
69%
13
5
Vertigo
50%
16
6
Inferno
60%
15
7
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs Akuma by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and Akuma, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Sangal. The MVP of this match was SENSEi.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sangal were ngiN contributed 45 kills and MAJ3R contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26268 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Akuma analytics
The team Akuma managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Akuma were SENSEi contributed 66 kills and Psycho contributed 52 kills. 28626 of total damage by Akuma could not prevent Sangal from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Akuma struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments