0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AUG damage (avg/round)
28.28.1
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
52141012
Shots (total/round)
10216
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
75%
Dust II
67%
Inferno
26%
Vertigo
25%
Mirage
11%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
25%
8
5
Dust II
33%
9
0
Inferno
86%
7
0
Vertigo
50%
2
3
Mirage
36%
11
2
Overpass
0%
0
15
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
5
1
Dust II
100%
1
1
Inferno
60%
5
5
Vertigo
25%
4
2
Mirage
25%
4
2
Overpass
0%
0
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- wwllw
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs Izako Boars by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and Izako Boars, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by Izako Boars. The MVP of this match was STOMP.
Izako Boars analytics
The team Izako Boars secured 38 out of 64 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Izako Boars were STOMP contributed 50 kills and byali contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25449 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Izako Boars held their ground firmly, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 26 out of 64 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were S3NSEY contributed 45 kills and paz contributed 41 kills. 21679 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent Izako Boars from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments