Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Player score (round)
41691011
Player score (round)
37141011
Player score (round)
36121011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
83%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
47%
Vertigo
38%
Anubis
23%
Mirage
11%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Inferno
0%
0
45
Nuke
47%
19
11
Vertigo
33%
18
8
Anubis
48%
27
6
Mirage
67%
15
12
Ancient
57%
28
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
83%
6
0
Inferno
50%
14
1
Nuke
0%
0
3
Vertigo
71%
7
3
Anubis
25%
8
6
Mirage
56%
16
0
Ancient
55%
11
2
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Dust II, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was H1te.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 26 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were H1te contributed 42 kills and sm3t contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17050 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 18 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were jottAAA contributed 31 kills and LNZ contributed 30 kills. 14564 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments