Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.616.3
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
36631010
Damage (total/round)
38673
Player score (round)
37511010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
57%
Inferno
53%
Nuke
47%
Mirage
35%
Anubis
27%
Vertigo
6%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
4
9
Inferno
0%
1
53
Nuke
47%
32
12
Mirage
75%
24
10
Anubis
56%
36
6
Vertigo
46%
24
12
Ancient
58%
36
9
Last 5 maps
Dust II
57%
7
0
Inferno
53%
15
17
Nuke
0%
2
36
Mirage
40%
10
26
Anubis
29%
17
20
Vertigo
52%
21
15
Ancient
61%
31
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and fnatic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Dust II, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was blameF.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 29 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Dust II. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were blameF contributed 39 kills and KRIMZ contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16793 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 14 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were xfl0ud contributed 30 kills and jottAAA contributed 36 kills. 15002 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments