Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
16.54.7
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
14.54.7
Player score (round)
43921011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
e
76%
Mirage
68%
Ancient
55%
Anubis
17%
Overpass
15%
Nuke
e
3%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
24%
21
11
Mirage
68%
19
11
Ancient
55%
31
8
Anubis
57%
30
7
Overpass
48%
21
9
Nuke
47%
17
21
Inferno
0%
3
44
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
4
Mirage
0%
0
6
Ancient
0%
3
0
Anubis
40%
5
2
Overpass
33%
3
0
Nuke
50%
2
2
Inferno
0%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs ex-Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and ex-Preasy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by Sangal. The MVP of this match was jottAAA.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sangal were jottAAA contributed 66 kills and xfl0ud contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25525 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ex-Preasy analytics
The team ex-Preasy managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ex-Preasy were niko contributed 59 kills and TMB contributed 52 kills. 25510 of total damage by ex-Preasy could not prevent Sangal from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ex-Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments