0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.52
Shots (total/round)
9016
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35761012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
10723.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
58%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
40%
Overpass
18%
Ancient
17%
Inferno
15%
Vertigo
7%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
58%
12
17
Nuke
0%
0
35
Mirage
60%
10
5
Overpass
44%
18
9
Ancient
67%
21
1
Inferno
59%
22
7
Vertigo
57%
14
13
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
9
Nuke
50%
12
1
Mirage
100%
3
8
Overpass
62%
13
1
Ancient
50%
2
4
Inferno
44%
16
1
Vertigo
50%
12
2
Info
Match analysis of Sangal vs EKO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and EKO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Sangal. The MVP of this match was kory.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sangal were kory contributed 23 kills and phzy contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8308 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EKO analytics
The team EKO managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EKO were Gizmy contributed 16 kills and arTisT contributed 14 kills. 6902 of total damage by EKO could not prevent Sangal from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EKO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments