Ended
Sangal
2 - 0
500
Full stats

0 Comments

Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

13

5

+4

96

2:0

4

0

7.1

+27%

15

8

9

+7

88

2:2

4

1

6.8

+30%

15

12

5

+3

89

2:3

5

0

6.6

+10%

15

13

3

+2

68

4:2

4

0

6.3

-1%

12

9

1

+3

53

2:1

2

1

6.0

-2%

Total

74

55

23

+19

394

12:8

19

2

6.6

+13%

500 Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

14

3

+5

85

4:1

4

0

7.3

+18%

12

16

4

-4

67

1:2

2

0

5.5

-18%

9

14

6

-5

65

0:4

1

1

5.1

-22%

7

17

5

-10

47

3:2

2

0

4.9

-31%

8

13

5

-5

42

0:3

2

1

4.7

-29%

Total

55

74

23

-19

305

8:12

11

2

5.5

-16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were LNZ, who contributed 17 kills, and Yxngstxr, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7878 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


500 on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for 500, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 500 on Anubis included SHiPZ, who contributed 19 kills, and REDSTAR, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6103 total damage, 500 couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date