Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
13.13.4
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
18.14.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.22
Smoke thrown on a map
2115.0371
Player score (round)
37721012
Shots (total/round)
9316
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
34951012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
31%
Mirage
27%
Ancient
15%
Dust II
10%
Vertigo
6%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
9
Overpass
50%
10
2
Inferno
22%
9
3
Mirage
11%
9
4
Ancient
45%
11
2
Dust II
40%
5
5
Vertigo
50%
4
7
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
3
Overpass
100%
2
8
Inferno
53%
30
0
Mirage
38%
8
7
Ancient
60%
5
1
Dust II
50%
10
4
Vertigo
44%
9
2
Info
Match analysis of Sampi vs X by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sampi and X, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by X. The MVP of this match was deb0.
X analytics
The team X secured 27 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Dust II. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for X were deb0 contributed 43 kills and v1w contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15804 overall damage.
On the defensive side, X held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 14 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were GuardiaN contributed 27 kills and T4GG3D contributed 24 kills. 13957 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent X from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments