Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.92
HE damage (avg/round)
12.23.4
USP kills on a map
41.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
14.84.7
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.25.8
Assists on a map
17.044.4098
Shots (total/round)
9516
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
8926.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Vertigo
48%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
23%
Anubis
15%
Ancient
10%
Nuke
6%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
24
3
Vertigo
0%
4
45
Inferno
21%
14
33
Mirage
50%
26
3
Anubis
59%
22
4
Ancient
61%
36
2
Nuke
36%
14
20
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
27
Vertigo
48%
27
3
Inferno
54%
13
6
Mirage
27%
15
9
Anubis
44%
36
0
Ancient
51%
35
6
Nuke
42%
24
8
Info
Match analysis of Sampi vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sampi and PGE Turow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Sampi. The MVP of this match was manguss.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sampi were manguss contributed 58 kills and sAvana1 contributed 55 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26105 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PGE Turow were Markoś contributed 40 kills and Sobol contributed 43 kills. 21488 of total damage by PGE Turow could not prevent Sampi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PGE Turow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments