251
233
82
+18
386
46:26
53
4
Dust II6.2
+3%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
184.4189
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
68.616.3
Smoke thrown on a map
2514.5022
AK47 kills on a map
186.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
69.825.2
Shots (total/round)
9616
Player score (round)
35901010
Damage (total/round)
52873
Player score (round)
46611010
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
47%
Nuke
38%
Dust II
31%
Inferno
27%
Anubis
17%
Mirage
2%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
73
Nuke
38%
29
15
Dust II
40%
20
9
Inferno
32%
31
27
Anubis
65%
52
13
Mirage
51%
49
8
Ancient
56%
45
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
47%
15
10
Nuke
0%
0
24
Dust II
71%
28
0
Inferno
59%
22
0
Anubis
48%
31
7
Mirage
53%
19
6
Ancient
56%
25
6
Info
Match analysis of Sampi vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sampi and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Dust II, and victory was secured by Sampi. The MVP of this match was kensizor.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi secured 36 out of 71 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Dust II. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sampi were manguss contributed 59 kills and ZEDKO contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26201 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
kONO analytics
The team kONO managed to secure 35 out of 71 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for kONO were kensizor contributed 62 kills and amster contributed 54 kills. 27426 of total damage by kONO could not prevent Sampi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments