0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:27s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.13.9
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.93.5
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
133.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.7
Assists on a map
13.924.3808
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
48661011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Anubis
59%
Mirage
43%
Overpass
27%
Inferno
19%
Nuke
12%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
59
Anubis
59%
17
11
Mirage
43%
23
16
Overpass
56%
36
0
Inferno
31%
26
17
Nuke
44%
18
16
Ancient
50%
40
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
71%
7
6
Anubis
0%
3
20
Mirage
0%
8
16
Overpass
29%
7
13
Inferno
50%
4
7
Nuke
56%
9
0
Ancient
50%
24
1
Info
Match analysis of Sampi vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sampi and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HAVU. The MVP of this match was uli.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HAVU were uli contributed 27 kills and Airax contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8781 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were ZEDKO contributed 19 kills and fino contributed 17 kills. 8155 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent HAVU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments