0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
43%
Mirage
34%
Ancient
25%
Nuke
23%
Inferno
12%
Overpass
11%
Anubis
7%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
69
Mirage
67%
30
18
Ancient
57%
54
7
Nuke
41%
32
14
Inferno
45%
31
14
Overpass
67%
46
2
Anubis
50%
12
22
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
43%
7
23
Mirage
33%
21
5
Ancient
32%
22
6
Nuke
18%
11
15
Inferno
57%
30
0
Overpass
56%
18
4
Anubis
57%
7
21
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwll
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Sampi vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team
Sampi on Nuke Analysis
Sampi demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sampi on Nuke were fino, who contributed 22 kills, and T4GG3D, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8406 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Enterprise on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Enterprise, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Enterprise on Nuke included MoriiSko, who contributed 12 kills, and capseN, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5433 total damage, Enterprise couldn't prevent Sampi from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments