Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.35.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
10.12
Galil damage (avg/round)
175.8
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3023
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
11.63.5
USP damage (avg/round)
13.34.7
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
204.7
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.54
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
80%
Nuke
21%
Mirage
13%
Ancient
10%
Anubis
10%
Inferno
8%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
3
44
Nuke
36%
14
15
Mirage
41%
27
5
Ancient
53%
32
4
Anubis
66%
29
7
Inferno
56%
9
28
Dust II
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
80%
5
46
Nuke
57%
14
9
Mirage
54%
39
2
Ancient
43%
30
8
Anubis
56%
32
0
Inferno
64%
11
10
Dust II
0%
0
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sampi vs B8 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sampi and B8, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by B8. The MVP of this match was headtr1ck.
B8 analytics
The team B8 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for B8 were headtr1ck contributed 39 kills and alex666 contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17237 overall damage.
On the defensive side, B8 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were The eLiVe contributed 38 kills and manguss contributed 31 kills. 15245 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent B8 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments