Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
166.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
79.925.3
Deagle kills on a map
41.6964
HE damage (avg/round)
13.63.4
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:54s
Shots (total/round)
11916
Shots (total/round)
9116
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
67%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
26%
Vertigo
25%
Nuke
25%
Dust II
13%
Mirage
6%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
67%
6
2
Overpass
0%
0
10
Inferno
55%
11
0
Vertigo
50%
2
4
Nuke
50%
10
0
Dust II
33%
3
7
Mirage
56%
9
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
6
Overpass
50%
2
7
Inferno
29%
7
4
Vertigo
25%
4
9
Nuke
25%
12
3
Dust II
46%
13
2
Mirage
50%
12
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ONYX vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ONYX and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by ONYX. The MVP of this match was jR.
ONYX analytics
The team ONYX secured 31 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ONYX were jR contributed 43 kills and DiMKE contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20266 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ONYX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 20 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were lauNX contributed 37 kills and XELLOW contributed 32 kills. 16192 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent ONYX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments