0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.6
7
Inferno1.2
Win Rounds
23
30
Inferno6
Kills
165
216
Inferno22
Damage
19.11K
23.63K
Inferno1835
Economy
973.85K
1.15M
Inferno99400
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
3215.0371
M4A1 kills on a map
224.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
70.316.7
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.225.3
Kills on a map
40.217.5558
Damage (avg/round)
138.91939.7
Player score (round)
38631012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42701012
Damage (total/round)
46473
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Overpass
100%
Vertigo
100%
Mirage
92%
Dust II
75%
Nuke
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
8
2
Overpass
100%
9
4
Vertigo
100%
6
1
Mirage
92%
12
0
Dust II
75%
4
3
Nuke
0%
0
8
Ancient
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwlw
Info
Match analysis of Sacrifice vs CLG Red by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sacrifice and CLG Red, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by CLG Red. The MVP of this match was Emy.
CLG Red analytics
The team CLG Red secured 31 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CLG Red were Emy contributed 58 kills and GooseBreeder contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23629 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CLG Red held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sacrifice analytics
The team Sacrifice managed to secure 22 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sacrifice were empathy contributed 38 kills and milk contributed 39 kills. 19112 of total damage by Sacrifice could not prevent CLG Red from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sacrifice struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments