Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
113.4961
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
44.112.1
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.74
Player score (round)
34641011
Damage (total/round)
47373
Player score (round)
45161011
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
26%
Inferno
21%
Nuke
18%
Ancient
6%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
6
6
Mirage
67%
6
12
Inferno
63%
8
2
Nuke
58%
12
0
Ancient
53%
15
3
Anubis
67%
9
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
3
50
Mirage
41%
27
5
Inferno
42%
12
31
Nuke
40%
15
18
Ancient
59%
39
3
Anubis
69%
26
8
Info
Match analysis of RUSH B vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between RUSH B and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by Sampi. The MVP of this match was Kiro.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sampi were sAvana1 contributed 50 kills and fino contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25976 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RUSH B analytics
The team RUSH B managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RUSH B were Kiro contributed 52 kills and tex1y contributed 50 kills. 24915 of total damage by RUSH B could not prevent Sampi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RUSH B struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments