Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
113.4961
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
44.112.1
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
M4A1 kills on a map
114.491
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.74
Player score (round)
34641011
Damage (total/round)
47373
Player score (round)
45161011
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
26%
Inferno
21%
Nuke
18%
Ancient
6%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
6
6
Mirage
67%
6
12
Inferno
63%
8
2
Nuke
58%
12
0
Ancient
53%
15
3
Anubis
67%
9
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
3
50
Mirage
41%
27
5
Inferno
42%
12
31
Nuke
40%
15
18
Ancient
59%
39
3
Anubis
69%
26
8
Info
Match analysis of RUSH B vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between RUSH B and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by Sampi. The MVP of this match was Kiro.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi secured 35 out of 70 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sampi were sAvana1 contributed 50 kills and fino contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25976 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RUSH B analytics
The team RUSH B managed to secure 35 out of 70 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RUSH B were Kiro contributed 52 kills and tex1y contributed 50 kills. 24915 of total damage by RUSH B could not prevent Sampi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RUSH B struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments