0 Comments
138
148
38
-10
360
22:20
31
4
0%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
40%
Nuke
40%
Inferno
33%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
33%
Ancient
30%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
40%
5
0
Nuke
0%
2
2
Inferno
33%
6
1
Vertigo
100%
1
1
Mirage
50%
2
3
Ancient
50%
2
1
Dust II
0%
0
3
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
1
Nuke
40%
5
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Vertigo
67%
3
1
Mirage
83%
6
0
Ancient
80%
5
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of ROYALS vs SACRAMENTO by the Bo3.gg Team
ROYALS on Ancient Analysis
ROYALS demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 22 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ROYALS on Ancient were Nono2K, who contributed 36 kills, and jeyN, who added 33 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 15767 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, ROYALS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SACRAMENTO on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for SACRAMENTO, as they managed to secure 20 out of 42 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SACRAMENTO on Ancient included sToRm, who contributed 30 kills, and MyLastChance, who added 31 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 15129 total damage, SACRAMENTO couldn't prevent ROYALS from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, SACRAMENTO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments