0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3055
AUG kills on a map
92.6098
AUG damage (avg/round)
31.18.1
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.116.7
Smoke thrown on a map
2515.0371
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
63%
Dust II
60%
Mirage
55%
Vertigo
38%
Inferno
34%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
20%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Inferno
67%
3
1
Nuke
0%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Ancient
63%
8
10
Dust II
60%
20
2
Mirage
45%
22
0
Vertigo
38%
8
19
Inferno
33%
15
4
Nuke
25%
12
16
Overpass
20%
5
17
Info
Match analysis of ROYALS vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ROYALS and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Nexus. The MVP of this match was lauNX.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nexus were lauNX contributed 26 kills and RENNE contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10324 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nexus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ROYALS analytics
The team ROYALS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ROYALS were Grus contributed 16 kills and entz contributed 14 kills. 8133 of total damage by ROYALS could not prevent Nexus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ROYALS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments