Vertigo
11 - 13
Mirage
13 - 10
Anubis
7 - 13
Rooster Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

12

0

+8

86

1:2

4

0

7.1

+22%

14

13

2

+1

61

2:0

3

0

6.3

-7%

11

16

6

-5

95

2:2

2

0

6.2

-9%

3

14

4

-11

32

0:3

0

0

3.5

-48%

3

14

6

-11

24

1:7

0

0

3.1

-54%

Total

51

69

18

-18

297

6:14

9

0

5.2

-19%

TALON Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

10

0

+11

88

3:0

6

0

7.7

+28%

16

12

2

+4

91

4:1

4

0

7.0

-3%

15

10

5

+5

80

1:2

5

0

6.1

+25%

9

10

6

-1

68

3:0

2

0

5.9

-6%

8

9

8

-1

59

3:3

1

0

5.5

-17%

Total

69

51

21

+18

385

14:6

18

0

6.4

+5%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Rooster vs TALON by the Bo3.gg Team

TALON on Anubis Analysis

TALON demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for TALON on Anubis were ADDICT, who contributed 21 kills, and nettik, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7699 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, TALON held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Rooster on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Rooster, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Rooster on Anubis included asap, who contributed 20 kills, and Sliimey, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5940 total damage, Rooster couldn't prevent TALON from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date