for the BLAST.tv Austin Major!
$40k bounty jackpot
0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:22s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:22s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:21s01:22s
AK47 kills on a map
126.3346
AK47 damage (avg/round)
61.525.2
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.1785
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4548
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
19.44.2
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
43141011
Train
100%
Inferno
64%
Ancient
60%
Dust II
44%
Nuke
36%
Mirage
25%
Anubis
7%
Last 5 maps
Train
100%
4
7
Inferno
75%
12
7
Ancient
0%
0
23
Dust II
44%
18
5
Nuke
50%
18
4
Mirage
50%
10
1
Anubis
45%
11
9
Last 5 maps
Train
0%
4
4
Inferno
11%
9
2
Ancient
60%
5
0
Dust II
0%
0
11
Nuke
14%
7
5
Mirage
25%
4
7
Anubis
38%
8
1
In the CS2 match between Rooster and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was asap.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were asap contributed 19 kills and TjP contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8336 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KZG analytics
The team KZG managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KZG were foggers contributed 17 kills and Kras contributed 9 kills. 6482 of total damage by KZG could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments