0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.7
5.5
Vertigo0.6
Win Rounds
0
0
Vertigo0
Kills
0
0
Vertigo0
Damage
0
0
Vertigo0
Economy
812K
742.65K
Vertigo-14250
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
90%
Overpass
78%
Vertigo
78%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
44%
Anubis
33%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
90%
10
3
Overpass
78%
9
6
Vertigo
78%
9
7
Mirage
50%
8
4
Nuke
44%
9
1
Anubis
33%
3
1
Ancient
0%
0
21
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs Cobro's Cobros by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and Cobro's Cobros, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was nettik.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 26 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Vertigo. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were nettik contributed 39 kills and chelleos contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15617 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Cobro's Cobros analytics
The team Cobro's Cobros managed to secure 15 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Cobro's Cobros were Bones contributed 29 kills and bizkit^ contributed 26 kills. 13846 of total damage by Cobro's Cobros could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Cobro's Cobros struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments