G3 Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

15

4

-4

86

2:2

3

0

5.7

-35%

9

14

3

-5

54

2:0

0

0

5.2

-13%

10

17

4

-7

66

2:5

2

0

5.0

-26%

9

14

3

-5

63

1:2

2

0

5.0

-20%

11

16

2

-5

61

0:3

4

0

4.8

+19%

Total

50

76

16

-26

330

7:12

11

0

5.2

-15%

Rocket Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

18

10

2

+8

85

5:1

4

1

7.6

+17%

17

9

2

+8

85

3:0

6

0

7.4

+53%

14

11

8

+3

104

2:3

3

1

6.9

+12%

14

9

3

+5

69

1:2

4

0

6.1

+21%

12

12

7

0

80

1:1

3

0

5.8

-3%

Total

75

51

22

+24

424

12:7

20

2

6.8

+20%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of G3 vs Rocket by the Bo3.gg Team

Rocket on Anubis Analysis

Rocket demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Rocket on Anubis were nero, who contributed 18 kills, and ayy, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8055 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Rocket held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


G3 on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for G3, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for G3 on Anubis included C4LLM3SU3, who contributed 11 kills, and tmk, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6270 total damage, G3 couldn't prevent Rocket from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, G3 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date