River Plate Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

17

3

+11

106

4:0

8

0

8.4

+24%

18

17

5

+1

83

5:3

2

0

6.5

-1%

15

14

10

+1

84

3:2

4

0

6.5

+4%

17

12

3

+5

75

3:1

4

0

6.4

+16%

18

13

1

+5

69

1:3

7

0

6.1

+5%

Total

96

73

22

+23

416

16:9

25

0

6.8

+10%

Stone Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

19

6

0

85

4:2

4

0

6.7

+2%

21

18

0

+3

70

4:5

8

0

6.2

+2%

14

19

6

-5

83

0:1

3

0

5.6

-7%

13

19

5

-6

55

1:3

4

0

5.0

-18%

5

22

3

-17

34

0:5

1

0

3.2

-48%

Total

72

97

20

-25

326

9:16

20

0

5.3

-14%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of River Plate vs Stone by the Bo3.gg Team

River Plate on Inferno Analysis

River Plate demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for River Plate on Inferno were guidimon, who contributed 28 kills, and MRN1, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10409 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, River Plate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Stone on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Stone, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Stone on Inferno included Hezz, who contributed 19 kills, and andrew, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8159 total damage, Stone couldn't prevent River Plate from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Stone struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date