0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Ancient
63%
Dust II
33%
Inferno
12%
Nuke
12%
Vertigo
10%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
19
Ancient
63%
8
4
Dust II
50%
2
9
Inferno
55%
11
2
Nuke
50%
12
3
Vertigo
60%
5
10
Overpass
63%
8
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
5
10
Ancient
0%
0
26
Dust II
17%
6
12
Inferno
67%
21
1
Nuke
38%
8
8
Vertigo
50%
6
11
Overpass
63%
8
1
Last results
Past matches
- wwlwl
- lwwll
Info
Map Analysis of River Plate vs Leviatan by the Bo3.gg Team
Leviatan on Inferno Analysis
Leviatan demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Leviatan on Inferno were reversive, who contributed 24 kills, and meyern, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10341 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Leviatan held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
River Plate on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for River Plate, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for River Plate on Inferno included minimal, who contributed 20 kills, and atarax1a, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8798 total damage, River Plate couldn't prevent Leviatan from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, River Plate struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments