0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
81%
Dust II
64%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
25%
Vertigo
21%
Ancient
17%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
5
Dust II
100%
3
1
Inferno
50%
2
3
Nuke
67%
6
0
Vertigo
50%
2
2
Ancient
50%
2
3
Mirage
0%
0
8
Last 5 maps
Overpass
81%
16
1
Dust II
36%
11
8
Inferno
100%
8
6
Nuke
92%
12
0
Vertigo
71%
7
11
Ancient
67%
3
4
Mirage
0%
0
21
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of River Plate vs Bravos by the Bo3.gg Team
Bravos on Nuke Analysis
Bravos demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bravos on Nuke were kaiG, who contributed 24 kills, and Tuurtle, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 11909 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
River Plate on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for River Plate, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for River Plate on Nuke included atarax1a, who contributed 23 kills, and arieldidi, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10991 total damage, River Plate couldn't prevent Bravos from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, River Plate struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments