Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.8
AWP kills on a map
186.4049
AWP damage (avg/round)
81.521.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.22.1
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6528
Deagle kills on a map
41.6558
HE damage (avg/round)
133.4
Kills on a map
2916.9373
Assists on a map
134.4315
Player score (round)
40631010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Inferno
38%
Ancient
30%
Nuke
27%
Mirage
27%
Anubis
20%
Vertigo
15%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
4
3
Inferno
63%
27
1
Ancient
50%
20
10
Nuke
62%
21
1
Mirage
40%
5
9
Anubis
67%
12
9
Vertigo
40%
10
11
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
3
Inferno
25%
4
15
Ancient
20%
20
0
Nuke
35%
20
2
Mirage
13%
8
10
Anubis
47%
15
3
Vertigo
25%
4
5
Info
Match analysis of Rhyno vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rhyno and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Rhyno. The MVP of this match was snapy.
Rhyno analytics
The team Rhyno secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rhyno were snapy contributed 42 kills and Ag1L contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14601 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rhyno held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were Jelo contributed 25 kills and ottoNd contributed 23 kills. 11753 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent Rhyno from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments