Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.62
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.72
Shots (total/round)
8916
Shots (total/round)
8616
Shots (total/round)
13116
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
10023.8
Molotov damage (total/round)
16223.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
60%
Mirage
27%
Dust II
17%
Ancient
16%
Inferno
5%
Overpass
4%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Mirage
29%
7
2
Dust II
63%
8
3
Ancient
33%
3
7
Inferno
50%
8
0
Overpass
33%
6
4
Nuke
50%
2
7
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
60%
15
2
Mirage
56%
16
10
Dust II
46%
28
0
Ancient
17%
6
13
Inferno
45%
31
0
Overpass
29%
7
17
Nuke
50%
10
21
Info
Match analysis of Rehl vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rehl and SWS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Dust II, and victory was secured by SWS. The MVP of this match was bsd.
SWS analytics
The team SWS secured 43 out of 79 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 13 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SWS were bsd contributed 61 kills and stainzin contributed 61 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29345 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SWS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rehl analytics
The team Rehl managed to secure 36 out of 79 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 11 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rehl were LIN contributed 59 kills and kurg4n contributed 54 kills. 27826 of total damage by Rehl could not prevent SWS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rehl struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments