RED Canids Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

10

2

+3

0

0:0

0

0

0%

8

16

9

-8

0

0:0

0

0

0%

14

7

2

+7

0

0:0

0

0

0%

14

8

9

+6

0

0:0

0

0

0%

10

10

3

0

0

0:0

0

0

0%

Total

59

51

25

+8

0

0:0

0

0

0.0

0%

Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

13

5

-1

0

0:0

0

0

0%

8

10

0

-2

0

0:0

0

0

0%

7

11

5

-4

0

0:0

0

0

0%

11

14

8

-3

0

0:0

0

0

0%

9

10

5

-1

0

0:0

0

0

0%

Total

47

58

23

-11

0

0:0

0

0

0.0

0%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
There are currently no game data
Info
Map Analysis of RED Canids vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

RED Canids on Inferno Analysis

RED Canids demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for RED Canids on Inferno were coldzera, who contributed 13 kills, and felps, who added 8 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, RED Canids held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Gafolo, who contributed 12 kills, and Koala, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent RED Canids from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date