Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8164
USP kills on a map
31.6027
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Speed Round (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Anubis
100%
Ancient
67%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
43%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
3
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
2
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
43%
7
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- lwlww
Info
Match analysis of Razed Esports vs LOSTHILLS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Razed Esports and LOSTHILLS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by LOSTHILLS. The MVP of this match was VulcaN.
LOSTHILLS analytics
The team LOSTHILLS secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOSTHILLS were VulcaN contributed 20 kills and yena contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7424 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOSTHILLS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Razed Esports analytics
The team Razed Esports managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Razed Esports were cmrn contributed 18 kills and Ash_Red contributed 14 kills. 6652 of total damage by Razed Esports could not prevent LOSTHILLS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Razed Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments