0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.7
5.6
Ancient1.3
Win Rounds
26
20
Ancient3
Kills
175
139
Ancient23
Damage
18.51K
15.25K
Ancient1956
Economy
962.45K
893.45K
Ancient73100
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:23s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:23s
AK47 kills on a map
146.3792
AK47 damage (avg/round)
5925.2
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4531
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.74.2
USP kills on a map
41.5972
USP damage (avg/round)
16.74.9







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Info
Match analysis of Rare Atom vs T.Beast by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rare Atom and T.Beast, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by Rare Atom. The MVP of this match was somebody.
Rare Atom analytics
The team Rare Atom secured 26 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rare Atom were somebody contributed 46 kills and ChildKing contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18510 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rare Atom held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
T.Beast analytics
The team T.Beast managed to secure 20 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for T.Beast were gLong contributed 37 kills and Mr.3 contributed 24 kills. 15253 of total damage by T.Beast could not prevent Rare Atom from securing the victory
On the defensive side, T.Beast struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments