0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Vertigo
75%
Ancient
50%
Anubis
50%
Overpass
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Vertigo
75%
4
1
Ancient
50%
4
1
Anubis
50%
4
2
Overpass
0%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- lwlll
Info
Map Analysis of RAPTORS EC vs TopTab Club by the Bo3.gg Team
RAPTORS EC on Anubis Analysis
RAPTORS EC demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for RAPTORS EC on Anubis were BehinDx, who contributed 17 kills, and PrimeOPI, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7149 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, RAPTORS EC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
TopTab Club on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for TopTab Club, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for TopTab Club on Anubis included maQuein, who contributed 13 kills, and lunAtic, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6270 total damage, TopTab Club couldn't prevent RAPTORS EC from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, TopTab Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments