0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:25s
USP damage (avg/round)
16.74.8
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.64.1
Galil kills on a map
61.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
22.65.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.65.9
AK47 kills on a map
146.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
57.825.2
Multikill x-
4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Nuke
58%
Anubis
50%
Ancient
36%
Mirage
35%
Vertigo
9%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
2
2
Anubis
100%
4
0
Ancient
0%
2
3
Mirage
60%
5
0
Vertigo
33%
3
1
Inferno
50%
2
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
7
9
Nuke
58%
24
4
Anubis
50%
24
5
Ancient
36%
25
12
Mirage
25%
4
21
Vertigo
42%
12
9
Inferno
50%
32
0
Info
Match analysis of QUAZAR vs Rhyno by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between QUAZAR and Rhyno, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by QUAZAR. The MVP of this match was gehji.
QUAZAR analytics
The team QUAZAR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for QUAZAR were gehji contributed 36 kills and n4mb3r5 contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13799 overall damage.
On the defensive side, QUAZAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rhyno analytics
The team Rhyno managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rhyno were krazy contributed 23 kills and Ag1L contributed 24 kills. 11238 of total damage by Rhyno could not prevent QUAZAR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rhyno struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments