0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8168
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Player score (round)
39481010
Player score (round)
35861010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
64%
Anubis
63%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
30%
Nuke
25%
Inferno
8%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
64%
11
0
Anubis
63%
8
0
Vertigo
33%
6
1
Ancient
0%
2
6
Nuke
50%
6
3
Inferno
33%
3
4
Dust II
0%
3
3
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
30%
10
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Dust II
0%
3
0
Info
Match analysis of QUAZAR vs BakS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between QUAZAR and BakS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by QUAZAR. The MVP of this match was whisper.
QUAZAR analytics
The team QUAZAR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for QUAZAR were whisper contributed 19 kills and Tommy contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7904 overall damage.
On the defensive side, QUAZAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BakS analytics
The team BakS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BakS were Sa1nTy contributed 11 kills and z1k4 contributed 14 kills. 5686 of total damage by BakS could not prevent QUAZAR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BakS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments