0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.6027
M4A1 kills on a map
84.4189
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
M4A1 kills on a map
84.4189
Damage (total/round)
47373
Player score (round)
45351010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
83%
Mirage
67%
Ancient
18%
Vertigo
17%
Nuke
14%
Anubis
10%
Inferno
6%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
4
Mirage
67%
9
0
Ancient
29%
7
2
Vertigo
50%
2
2
Nuke
36%
11
1
Anubis
36%
14
0
Inferno
50%
6
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
17%
6
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Ancient
11%
9
0
Vertigo
33%
6
0
Nuke
50%
2
2
Anubis
46%
13
0
Inferno
56%
9
0
Info
Match analysis of Project G vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Project G and ADEPTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was SBT.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 26 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were SBT contributed 15 kills and cHeuuuuk contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14045 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Project G analytics
The team Project G managed to secure 9 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Project G were Vegi contributed 25 kills and eraa contributed 25 kills. 10034 of total damage by Project G could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Project G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments