0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5
7.3
Ancient2.2
Win Rounds
5
16
Ancient11
Kills
36
92
Ancient56
Damage
4.22K
9.45K
Ancient5226
Economy
215.75K
495.1K
Ancient279350
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Mirage
100%
Ancient
L
71%
Overpass
29%
Inferno
0%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
4
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Ancient
29%
7
1
Overpass
29%
7
1
Inferno
50%
4
3
Vertigo
0%
1
4
Nuke
0%
0
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- lllww
Info
Match analysis of premghouls vs LeeK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between premghouls and LeeK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by LeeK. The MVP of this match was kenzor.
LeeK analytics
The team LeeK secured 0 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LeeK were kenzor contributed 23 kills and yaph contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9484 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LeeK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
premghouls analytics
The team premghouls managed to secure 21 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for premghouls were keegaN contributed 13 kills and Z1W0W contributed 13 kills. 4223 of total damage by premghouls could not prevent LeeK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, premghouls struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments