Preasy Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

13

2

+9

77

4:1

8

1

7.3

+25%

15

12

4

+3

69

4:0

3

0

6.2

+17%

14

16

4

-2

73

1:0

4

0

6.0

-14%

14

16

5

-2

63

5:4

2

0

5.8

-6%

11

15

3

-4

53

1:3

2

1

5.2

-15%

Total

76

72

18

+4

335

15:8

19

2

6.1

+1%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

11

5

+11

99

4:2

7

0

7.8

+37%

15

15

5

0

86

1:2

2

1

6.3

+7%

13

20

4

-7

72

3:8

5

0

5.0

-20%

13

13

1

0

45

0:2

3

0

5.0

-16%

9

17

4

-8

34

0:1

1

0

4.5

-31%

Total

72

76

19

-4

335

8:15

18

1

5.7

-5%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Preasy vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were simke, who contributed 22 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8033 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Preasy on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Preasy, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Preasy on Anubis included Skejs, who contributed 22 kills, and VireZ, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8042 total damage, Preasy couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date