0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
37901011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37831011
Player score (round)
40881011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Mirage
50%
Vertigo
26%
Inferno
22%
Anubis
17%
Ancient
10%
Nuke
1%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
2
47
Vertigo
53%
30
6
Inferno
80%
25
6
Anubis
57%
28
24
Ancient
56%
41
5
Nuke
46%
24
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
0
Mirage
50%
2
18
Vertigo
27%
11
4
Inferno
58%
12
3
Anubis
40%
20
6
Ancient
46%
39
2
Nuke
47%
15
4
Info
Match analysis of Preasy vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Preasy and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Preasy. The MVP of this match was mAnGo.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Preasy were Skejs contributed 47 kills and VireZ contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21681 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Viperio were mAnGo contributed 49 kills and zodi contributed 39 kills. 20953 of total damage by Viperio could not prevent Preasy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Viperio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments