Preasy Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

14

8

+6

105

7:1

5

0

8.1

+15%

18

13

5

+5

92

2:1

3

0

7.1

+14%

17

12

4

+5

72

0:0

7

0

6.4

+20%

11

14

4

-3

61

4:4

2

0

5.4

-12%

9

9

4

0

44

1:1

2

0

5.3

-14%

Total

75

62

25

+13

374

14:7

19

0

6.5

+5%

PGE Turow Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

12

2

+10

88

3:3

5

0

7.6

+26%

12

15

3

-3

70

3:1

4

0

5.8

-6%

10

15

4

-5

70

1:3

2

0

5.3

-11%

11

16

4

-5

57

0:2

2

0

5.0

-20%

7

18

10

-11

64

0:5

2

0

4.2

-25%

Total

62

76

23

-14

348

7:14

15

0

5.6

-7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Preasy vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team

Preasy on Inferno Analysis

Preasy demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Preasy on Inferno were nicoodoz, who contributed 20 kills, and Altekz, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7853 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PGE Turow on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for PGE Turow, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PGE Turow on Inferno included Markoś, who contributed 22 kills, and darko, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7317 total damage, PGE Turow couldn't prevent Preasy from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, PGE Turow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date