0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:28s
HE kills on a map
21.1254
HE damage (avg/round)
12.73.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:05s00:39s
HE damage (avg/round)
21.83.4
USP kills on a map
31.6136
USP kills on a map
31.6136
Assists on a map
11.024.3478
Player score (round)
41321012
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
47%
Nuke
35%
Vertigo
34%
Overpass
20%
Inferno
15%
Anubis
11%
Ancient
7%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
31%
13
48
Nuke
62%
13
21
Vertigo
78%
18
13
Overpass
50%
26
9
Inferno
65%
34
2
Anubis
50%
10
42
Ancient
71%
42
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
78%
9
4
Nuke
27%
11
22
Vertigo
44%
9
16
Overpass
30%
10
13
Inferno
50%
10
17
Anubis
39%
18
9
Ancient
64%
33
0
Info
Match analysis of Preasy vs IKLA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Preasy and IKLA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by Preasy. The MVP of this match was nicoodoz.
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Preasy were nicoodoz contributed 46 kills and roeJ contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18776 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
IKLA analytics
The team IKLA managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for IKLA were Kvem contributed 49 kills and MICHU contributed 34 kills. 15955 of total damage by IKLA could not prevent Preasy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, IKLA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments